Art is a unique form of self-expression.
We can freely observe, discuss, criticize or admire sculptures, paintings, literary works of different styles and genres. But does anyone have a right to prevent a talented sculptor from following his inspiration and setting up a new monument?
Tsereteli wants to give birth to a new masterpiece? Great. Then let him do it.
I can't understand why Moscow municipal duma finds this idea "unethical". What "moral principles" are they talking about? Two similar monuments already exist in our country. Why should the building of the third one be forbidden then? The only reason here might be the protest of Mr. Luzhkov. But if he supports the idea - what's the problem?
Mr. Luzhkov has become one of the most vivid and well-known symbols of modern Russia and modern Moscow. He is a gifted politician, writer, sportsman, scientist (!!!!!). Yes, he has been criticized for some slips but in comparison with the profits his leadership has brought to our capital they seem almost nothing. For many people his resignation has become a real shock.
I think, Mr. Luzhkov is an outstanding personality and his monument will become a new remarkable sight of our carital.